Paid social performance review

Meta Ads Performance
Marketing Report

A campaign-level view of spend, purchase results and traffic quality, combining the historical account export with the latest Ads Manager screenshot.

Executive snapshot

Latest Ads Manager screenshot — visible campaign rows only

Screenshot view
Total spend
₹5.74L14 visible campaign rows
Website purchases
94913 purchase-objective rows
Weighted cost per purchase
₹602.97Purchase-row spend ÷ purchases
Impressions
2.66MSum of displayed rows
Link clicks
96,593All displayed rows
Landing-page views
86,982All displayed rows
Link CTR (weighted)
3.63%Link clicks ÷ impressions
Cost per landing-page view
₹6.60Total spend ÷ landing-page views
Reporting scope: The screenshot’s date range is not visible. These figures cover only the 14 rows shown and should not be added to the multi-year CSV totals.

Historical account performance

Cumulative export from 3 October 2023 to 3 November 2026

CSV view
Campaign-level spend
₹17.91LNamed campaign rows only
Reported purchases
2,797Meta-reported purchase results
Blended reported CPA
₹601Purchase-campaign spend ÷ results
Account impressions
8.91MAccount summary row

The historical export is cumulative and does not contain a monthly breakdown. The blank campaign-name summary row is excluded from campaign spend to avoid duplicate counting.

Campaign performance

Campaigns visible in the latest screenshot, ranked by website purchases

CampaignPurchasesSpendCost / purchaseLink CTRLanding views
Shopping Ads New350₹2,21,596.68₹633.132.97%35,782
Anarkali Palazzo Set – Jan 26285₹1,25,122.66₹439.341.59%15,021
Sharara Set222₹1,46,594.17₹660.333.51%24,670
Winter Collection Shopping Ads67₹48,004.77₹716.493.65%8,403
Anarkali Suit11₹5,768.03₹524.373.78%1,259
Anokhi Anarkali Designer Suit Ads4₹4,420.99₹1,105.251.71%538
Shehnai New Ads2₹6,742.42₹3,371.213.32%462
Khubaani Kurta and Palazzo with Dupatta Design1₹2,613.88₹2,613.882.99%328
Summer Collection 20267₹8,190.97₹1,170.141.38%281
Anarkali Suit – New Jan 26—₹148.04—4.36%13
Anarkali Palazzo Set—₹559.28—1.64%57
Noor Mahal Suit Digital Print With Embroidery—₹1,087.81—1.24%29
Noor Designer Anarkali Complete Set—₹1,364.22—1.74%139
Brand Collaboration Ads—₹1,694.84Link-click campaign1.03%—

“—” means no purchase result or landing-page-view value was visible in the screenshot; it is not an assertion of zero backend orders.

Cost efficiency comparison

Selected purchase campaigns with at least 10 reported purchases

Cost per purchase

Anarkali Palazzo Jan 26
₹439
Anarkali Suit
₹524
Sharara Set
₹660
Winter Collection
₹716

What the numbers suggest

Lowest CPA at scale₹439
Highest purchase volume350
Click → LPV rate90.05%
Weighted link CPC₹5.94
Anarkali Palazzo Set – Jan 26 combines the lowest CPA among the larger purchase campaigns with 285 reported purchases. Shopping Ads New leads in purchase volume. Validate margin and order quality before shifting budgets.

Key performance insights

What to investigate next

01

Strong purchase volume

Shopping Ads New, Anarkali Palazzo Set – Jan 26 and Sharara Set account for the largest visible purchase counts. Review their creative and product-level contribution.

02

Efficient acquisition candidate

Anarkali Palazzo Set – Jan 26 reports ₹439.34 per purchase. Test controlled budget increases while monitoring marginal CPA.

03

Landing-page journey

About 90% of reported link clicks became landing-page views in the screenshot. Review campaign-level differences and mobile experience.

Recommended optimisation roadmap

A practical 30-day action plan

Week 1 · AuditValidate Pixel, CAPI, purchase value, attribution and backend order matching.
Week 2 · CreativeTest product close-ups, styling reels, customer proof and occasion-led hooks.
Week 3 · BudgetRun controlled scale tests on campaigns with competitive CPA and healthy volume.
Week 4 · Landing pageImprove mobile speed, product information, trust signals and checkout friction.
Ongoing · ReviewTrack net revenue, margin, delivered orders, cancellations and true ROAS.

Reporting notes & FAQs

Can we calculate ROAS from this report?

No. Purchase value or revenue is not present in the supplied CSV or visible screenshot. Add purchase conversion value and backend net revenue to calculate ROAS accurately.

Why are historical CSV and screenshot totals separate?

The CSV is a cumulative multi-year export, while the screenshot has no visible date range and includes only 14 visible campaigns. Their reporting periods may overlap.

Does a Meta purchase equal a delivered order?

Not necessarily. Reconcile Meta purchase events with actual orders, cancellations, RTO, returns and refunds before judging profitability.

What should be the target CPA?

Set an allowable CPA using selling price, discounts, gross margin, shipping, payment fees, COD costs and expected returns. Do not use a generic benchmark.